following the flowers at FRIEZE LA 2023

by ROSANNA ALBERTINI –

photos RA (visual notes highly improved by my husband Peter Kirby)

One step inside, and the Stendhal syndrome alters my mental clarity. Confusion, dizziness: art fairs are not the place for celestial sensations. They are not the best place to encounter art at all. Personal sensations are overflowed by a loud orchestra of colors and forms, and shrunk by the effort of reading microscopic labels. Very few doing that. 

I’m too curious to give up. To keep my sanity I think of David Hockney’s flowers, and follow the flowers, if there are any. My visit turns out to be surprising, it takes a long time. Yet, I’m not writing a review. I was in an odd space, parallel to the commercial effort at the origin of this big show, that’s why I don’t mention galleries. I keep myself there. Looking for art of today, wanting to savor something new.

The first painting that stops me is familiar and unexpected: Piero D’Orazio geometric abstraction  Light Colors, 1962. Those colors are a musical space weaving the spirit of flowers so tiny and delicate they hardly last a day; they just open the eyes and sleep, protected by a grid that doesn’t hurt them. Of course, they are mental. And the mind perceive them more than the eyes. World War II is around the corner, I am seventeen, I buy a newspaper for the first time, get lost. In Italy we are all survivors. Light colors are hope and a sense of flutter in the stomach. 

William Kentridge – Black & white flowers in a vase, as tall as a human. Art of now. Really, they are two drawings emotionally clinging one to the other. The small on the ground is a contemporary Goya, soldiers shooting at people. Life and death crept into the flowers sucking out every color. The eyes’ sensors transfer this feeling in my brain, blindness not allowed. 

I want to know how it feels to be them.” Words by Chantal Joffe. She means the people she portrays; her flowers share with them the same powerful manner of her painting. Stems and leaves are forced in an undesirable place, cornered. The vase as well isn’t comfortable. I keep seeing the two round sides of the vase as if they were stems folding down. Not reasonable, I know. Believe me, these painted flowers are pushing themselves out of the canvas. (Cornflowers, 2020) Let’s praise this artist, without nostalgia for Van Gogh.

Ana MendietaFlower person, 1975. She convinces me. Real flowers for the body and a stick as a pillow, with fake flowers. Nothing’s heavy. Her soul is dressed white and pink, as is her body. For a moment flesh and blood are forgotten. I forget her death. I had a similar vision when I was nine, on a hot afternoon, while covering my body with tiny white flowers just before a hemorrhage started from my nose, that no one was able to stop. 

Yoshitomo Nara, Under the Hazy Sky, 2012   Like a piece of music, bringing all the vibrations of the empty space around a little person completely absorbed into the mystery of thinking: what are those minuscule double leaves? Did I killed them picking them up? They didn’t cry. They smell a little, must be alive. 

Michal RovnerPragim (Poppies) 1 2023 LCD Screen.      A sculptor of time in video forms, Michal makes visible the uninterrupted movement of people and things. Her effort is to reveal the truth of their movement. It can be a human population or leaves or flowers. The universe plays in their lives more than we imagine. Poppies float in a restricted space; withered petals are subdued into gray, brown, or white colors. The physical soul of the stems remains thin, tall, extremely fragile. Is the artist giving a vegetable look to the endless battle between Israeli leaders and Palestinian? An image of exhaustion?

 Paul McCarthySilicone 2020-2023  Painted silver, it is not silver. The three stereotypes of Disney’s characters are caricatures: a loquacious duck is for Snow White. Comedy replaces drama & dreams, vive Stendhal. OMG Paul, this is so sad! You know? Even more because those flowers, to me, are thick and round, like money. This little sculpture is a mournful monument to the end of an empire, also the end of so many people dreams. My father would have been one of them. One day he appeared in the garden, where I used to spend the whole day as a child, waving a sheet of paper. “He answered!” he told me barely containing his excitement, “This is Walt Disney’s Picture and his signature!” He had sent to California an advertisement offer from the Italian version of Topolino, Micky cartoons, pretending he did it for me. To his dismay, I couldn’t care less and did’nt open my mouth. 

Jean-Marie AppriouCherry blossoms 2022 Painted bronze.  A French sculptor. From the on-line display I see he made many of these pieces, to express peculiar feelings. It’s a beautiful, strange piece, a stranger in the show. It brings me to remember similar decorative sculptures in Italian cemeteries. (The place where Lucio Fontana came from, working with his father). Today, in Los Angeles, it seems like a gentle alien from another time, I liked the surprise it gave me, still I am touched.  

Jeff Koons  Puppy, 1998  Porcelain vase, Edition of 3000. A dog 3000 times humiliated to hold flowers. I have sympathy for him.  

Doron LangbergSunflowers 2, 2022   A young painter from Israel who lives in Brooklyn happily sharing ideas and experiences with a small community of artist friends. It sounds new to me, as new as Gertrude Stein Picasso and others in Paris in the 20s. One reads about them, hoping it happens again. One hundred years after. Doron declares his connection to Bonnard or Van Gogh in a simple way. Right. His artworks are completely new, original  and inspired, incorporating hints from the past. I would never be tired watching these sensual, hard-living and dying sunflowers. I thank him. 

Giorgio Morandi   – Surprised, in my quest for flowers, I can’t avoid an act of devotion to Morandi’s still life. Flowers were in the vases, now empty. Their cycle ended, the whole painting holds onto the idea of tender colors, inorganic bodies reflecting pink. 

Laura Owens –  Untitled 2023  But I see flowers. Don’t mistake me. The real flower in this piece is the act of painting: thickness and flatness without conflict; delicate small details between spots of color that seem to come directly from the tube; a vine with leaves is the background of a red and blue dance of large commas with no text; it’s an earthly painting that includes the sky and the sea in a luminous window, superposes day and night. There are no clock hands turning these colors off and on. Only a marvelous crack in the artist’s mind. No photograph can render such work. 

John Chamberlain, Untitled 1962     Painted copper. Isolated in a corner, the 15x21cm sculpture fell from the sky of unreasonable objects, wishing the market will find a place for her. It was an outgrowth from the artist’s hands. I see a bud with 2 geometrical pistils expanding in search of pollen, a desiccated flower magically turned into copper, whose colors never fade.

Pae WhiteCyan I am  104.5 x 105 in  A big tapestry, extraordinary. Once more, not for photos. Forgive the images’ imperfection. Based on colors: cyan is dominant and yet yellow and pink are a massive presence. Flowers, maybe, or and fireflies? Not the point. The visual impact is powerful and gentle at the same time. Not that far from D’Orazio texture of light colors. As a portrait of a natural fable it makes you forget the urban scene in which you move. It makes you want to stay, and lie down in the grass and look at the fireflies at the end of the day. You also become Cyan.

A marathon of writing. After all, I crossed Frieze like a knife on a couple of legs, and this post is my own Fontana cut through the art I saw. Fontana must be mentioned by necessity: his works were the largest presence in the whole exhibition. Among many honest and often interesting artworks, perhaps burdened by absorbing the immense amount of perceptions and data, natural and artificial, and by struggling to find a personal focus —the ‘domestic heart’ in our garden of dramas and contentment— I feel grateful. Grata, we Italians say. We are particles in the sand of history.

The present is the only reality we belong to. Some of the last words by Marcel Duchamp say the Art of today is the only one we understand. What about the past? (Future is in question) I would say Art made before is a visual vocabulary enlarging our experience. No copy, no appropriation by young artists. Just available information like words we speak and melodies we sing. Some contemporary composers remake in their own spirit classic pieces they love. It isn’t stealing. It’s digesting. Visual artists do the same with impressionism, cubism, ancient art and are completely themselves. Nothing is hidden.

The artist as a hero was a myth. Fontana in the middle of all that is a good reminder: the foliage of the world gives us a home, but we still have to cut the surface to the core, if we want our existence to move on.

Origins are sweet, though. The following image is a painting by Oreste Albertini, my grandfather, and the girl is me. A fantasy landscape. I only have a B&W photo.

FOCUS ON HERE, NOW

 AL PAYNE:

After a life spent hiding his paintings in a wood shed, Paris became his scent of the rose for two years, then he died: it was September 2007

by ROSANNA ALBERTINI

This post is dedicated to all the ‘invisible’ artists who steadily grow on the forest floor of the artworld. Often not known enough to be forgotten. Al Payne not only built his sheds, he filled them with paintings and the human scape the paintings contained, a physical density needing protection, not to be exposed to a price that could be money or intellectual evaluation or both. The colors of life, sounds and feelings collapsed, maybe, so inseparably into those pantings that the artist locked them into his inner space. He did not cut the umbilical cord.

Allan Kaprow would say, “His act is tragic because the man could not forget art.” And yes, Al Payne sacrificed himself in a romantic dream of purity, dragging his artworks into his tomb before death. It would be easy to misunderstand. Only an extreme love for life leads to such a secretive activity. Or the discovery that life, and art, are in big part beyond concept, “enactment of hope” out of heartbreak and failure. He did not want to break the common roots that keep a person and her art in only one body.

From Al Payne’s notebook:

Attempt at conjuring the unthinkable thru painting.

1987-2001 – reaction to cancer, light and passing of time, family as subject-drawings, paintings pictures of family, home. Focus on here, now.

2002-2004- Dirt paintings here, now. Existence drawings

2005-2006 -reaction to parents death, rejection by family-Painting o/c. Paintings become ‘automatic’ avoidance of photography as basis for imagery. Draw, paint.

Late ’00 – invisible sculpture, engage artworld, recovery from family rejection –

20150126_Box_Payne_064

AL PAYNE, Self-Portrait, 2007, Drawing on Paper – Courtesy of The Box, Los Angeles

Paris Late ’00 seems to be a NO TIME for Al Payne in Paris, his metamorphosis from the American inchworm to an elegant butterfly. A space of existence not needing to be measured. A taste of history, beautiful people, new food, a lot of white buildings under a sky shading walls and pavements with different clouds at every hour. An upsetting light. Often for lack of it. His dreams changed as well. He told Paul McCarthy, the affectionate friend who called him twice a week when he was in Paris, that he had a dream about his paintings, they were carried one by one. Time wasn’t moving onward, wasn’t moving at all. His last piece, The Invisible Sculpture, 2006/2007/2015 is a crate whose content changes size every time the container is opened. Open Paris, here is an other man, a new Al Payne, maybe taller, flaneur. “An old debonair man in a suit,” says Mara, “interviewed by Yves Klein’s daughter!”

Who was Al Payne? “A very sweet man” Mara McCarthy says. Her eyes in search of a figure that was a name, a story heard in her parents voice much more than a real person. “I don’t know, I don’t know if it’s me or my mom, who always told Al was the sweetest person in the world.” Odd coincidence, Al Payne left his painting on earth when he moved out, for his last journey, in September 2007. The same month and year in which Mara opened The Box, an L.A. art gallery she runs in collaboration with her father Paul.

On January 24, 2015, at 4 in a sunny afternoon, the Box made Al Payne’s dream a real thing: the wooden sheds were in the building with their big mouths open: from a truck parked outside the paintings were transported one by one, by hand, into the sheds. They will stay there, unseen, the whole time of the exhibition. The moving display (theory) of paintings was art for the time of a quick, imperfect view but also, unmistakably, a mystic exposure of the artist’s body spread in his work.                        

_1050651_1050650_1050652_1050655_1050662_1050664_1050665_1050674_1050675_1050678_1050685_1050690

From Shadows by William Carlos Williams

Ripped from the concept of our lives and from all concept somehow, and plainly,

the sun will come up each morning and sink again.

So that we experience violently every day two worlds

one of which we share with the rose in bloom and one,

by far greater, with the past, the world of memory,

the silly world of history, the world of imagination.

Which leaves only the beasts and trees, crystals with their refractive surfaces

and rotting things to stir our wonder.

Save for the little central hole of the eye itself

into which we dare not stare too hard or we are lost.

The instant trivial as it is is all we have unless-unless

things the imagination feeds upon, the scent of the rose, startle us anew.

THE DECAY OF SWEETNESS

O  B  J  E  T S      D’  A  F  F  E  C  T  I  O  N

P1040113

P1040106

 Paul McCarthy as I know him: André Gide wrote it so well that I won’t change a word.

It could be Paul’s voice:

“I maintain that what an artist has to believe in is this: that there is a special world, to which he alone has the key. It’s not that he must contribute something new, though even that would be an enormous achievement; but that everything in him must be or seem new, transmitted through a powerfully coloring idiosyncrasy.

He must have a particular philosophy, aesthetic, morality; his whole work tends only to show it. And that is what makes his style. He must also have a particular wit — his own sense of fun.” 

(Photos: R.A.)